MY FUNNY CORPORATE VALENTINE I couldn't relate to white women in tiaras talking Big Talk and having exotic conflicts over exotic dangers. The last time I remember enjoying the book was when Denny O'Neil, Mike Sekowsky and Larry Hama (editor) took her powers away, killed Steve Trevor, and dressed her in miniskirts and go-go boots. Denny is just a genius. And he wasn't particularly fond of the I-Ching era. But it was daring. It had an idea, a way to make all of this dusty Greek mythology relevant to Joe Lunchbox. I really ticked 'em off. In this essay, written two years ago, I referred to my WW story, The 18th Letter, as being a "milestone," while complaining about how the story and the book was handled by DC. Fans of Wonder Woman found my essay and complained bitterly on message boards, taking me completely apart limb by limb. As I explained on the DC Message board, The 18th Letter was a milestone in the sense that it is the first story of it's kind: a villain commits atrocities in order to blackmail Wonder Woman into sleeping with him. To my knowledge, that story has not been done before, therefore, yeah, I'd say ...Letter was, indeed, a milestone in WW lore. "Milestone" doesn't mean "greatest story ever written," or, for that matter, even, "good." It just means it's a first. They also took issue with my saying Wonder Woman is boring. Well, she is boring. DC Comics, perhaps in some effort to protect their corporate interest, has traditionally handcuffed writers and artists on WW (artists less so these days, with ill-advised "good girl" thong shots of WW— not wise, gang) to keep her, well, fairly mainstream (there— is that better than saying "wonder bread"?). Diana is a stiff, kids. There's just no two ways about it. But, so is Black Panther. Both are from exotic, far-off lands with strange customs. Both are vested in ancient tradition and both have a mission to share those core values with us dumb Amerikanskis. The main difference is Marvel could care less if I shoved Panther n front of a truck (well, at least until his film goes into production), while DC has a major merchandising investment in the venerable Amazon. I confess I have not read any of Phil Jimenez's work on the book, although the book gets rave reviews. I wasn't a big fan of George Perez' WW either, which I realize is heresy to a great many WW fans, but there ya go. I couldn't relate to white women in tiaras talking Big Talk and having exotic conflicts over exotic dangers. I mean, what did any of that have to do with me? On the other hand, I didn't want to read about Wonder Woman serving up burritos at Taco Whiz, either. The fact is, nobody has had a consistently winning vision for the character in a long time. Any real vision for the book has to be filtered through DC's legal and merchandising team, so it's not like I could turn her into Queen Of The Bitches or anything. The last time I remember enjoying the book was when Denny O'Neil, Mike Sekowsky and Larry Hama (editor) took her powers away, killed Steve Trevor, and dressed her in miniskirts and go-go boots. Denny is just a genius. And he wasn't particularly fond of the I-Ching era. But it was daring. It had an idea, a way to make all of this dusty Greek mythology relevant to Joe Lunchbox. I think Wonder Woman has lots of potential, but I could think of no greater nightmare than having to write her book every month, under the then-atmosphere of must-not-rock-boat. My fill-in stories usually surrounded WW with colorful characters since she herself was, by edict, quite pale. Also, a fill-in story is no place to advance real characterization: you're just house-sitting till Byrne arrives. So my hands were tied extra-special tight: I was absolutely forbidden from making Diana interesting or giving her many more notes than you'd see in your average Super Friends episode. The 18th Letter was intended to change all of that. Originally conceived as a hardcover graphic novel, The 18th Letter was designed to be edgy and controversial. It was also my only real at-bat with the character: a chance to do more with her than just baby-sit the book for some guy who couldn't read a calendar. It was my first and for all I know my last actual Wonder Woman story: the first time I actually had much to say about the character (although, WONDER WOMAN #137, where Circe turns Hippolyta, WW's mother, into Jamie Buchman— Helen Hunt's urban housewife from the NBC comedy Mad About You— came close to saying something about her, about her life and relationship to her mother).
For reasons both too long and too stupid to go into here, The 18th Letter was cut from 96 pages to 66 and instead of being a hardcover special edition became three skippable issues of the wrongheaded anthology LEGENDS OF THE DC UNIVERSE— a book whose entire premise, of continuity-based and continuity-extending asides in the histories of their heroes, has been ruined by DC's cavalier regard for continuity in this series. These issues are no longer considered canonical, so ...Letter was, more or less, an exercise is futility. I was writing to the wind. I'm really sorry if my original essay, following, insulted Wonder Woman fans. There's no percentage in insulting people who support you, and WW fans have supported my work in the past and I'm quite grateful. Wonder Woman is not a dull concept, but she has, for very long stretches, been a dull character. I'm hoping my pal Phil is changing all of that these days, and that the fans are happy and the character and book continues to thrive. I'm not really sure what I'd do with her if I got the assignment. I tend not to think in what-ifs, especially when the possibility of an offer from DC is incredibly remote: even speculating about a Priest Wonder Woman would be a great an exercise in futility as trying to bring The 18th Letter into fruition ultimately became. Christopher
J. Priest
I've had several flirtations with
WONDER WOMAN. THE 18th LETTER, a story arc I did in LEGENDS OF THE DC UNIVERSE, was a milestone for the character. But, since the story was not in WW's own book, but was in the questionably legitimate demi-continuity of the LEGENDS book, it was like the tree falling in the forest with no one to hear it. The concept of a ruthless villain making an indecent proposal to WW is, to my knowledge, a unique one. Overall, the arc was fairly well executed, with some critical realigning of alliances between WW, Superman and Batman that will, doubtless, be ignored for decades to come.
ONCE UPON A TIME: There was a seer named Amphiaraus whose wife Eriphyle talked him
into joining the Seven Against Thebes in an ill-fated war against the
Theban king. Amphiarus and the Seven were slaughtered, and
Amphiarus' son ALCMAEON united the sons of the Seven, called the Epigoni
or "The Afterborn," in a more successful second expedition,
after which Alcmaeon killed Eriphyle- his own mother- to avenge his
father's death (Eriphyle was part of a scheme to kill Amphiaraus and the
Seven). After committing matricide, Alcmaeon went insane, and
wandered from place to place, haunted by avenging goddesses, the Erinyes
(a trio of medusa-like demonic creatures), and condemned
to never find peace until he reached a spot on the Earth where the sun had
not shone at the time he slew his mother.
TWO THOUSAND YEARS LATER: Michael Lysander is the ruthless military leader of a vicious rebel
faction in a DCU-invented eastern European country. Lysander has
unseated the government and now his forces have set upon a genocidal
mission of ethnic cleansing, claiming his right to rebuild the ancient
nation of Attica. The rest of the world, shocked at the
atrocities, level resolution after resolution, and the U.S. threatens
intervention, but the killing goes unabated while Lysander's diplomats
stall and deal.
—if Wonder Woman will spend one night with him.
CONFESSIONS OF AN IDIOT Mark Waid once told me about an issue of IMPULSE where Bart
drives a car off a cliff on the last page. I asked Mark,
"So, how does he get down?" Mark: "I have no idea
whatsoever." That's actually the fun of this job: to discover things
about the characters and to share those discoveries with the audience. The
only stories worth writing anymore are the ones that challenge both the
characters and the readers to grow together and to have a shared learning
experience. To go charging into the unknown. |
TOP OF PAGE |